I do believe that the Dean’s thinking is muddling the presssing problem of intercourse using the issue of wasted time.
Guess that a man that is married strung along a marriage-seeking girl without ever making love along with her (put aside for the present time why he’d do this type of thing–maybe he simply didn’t arrive at that part yet). Would the Dean nevertheless argue that the defrauded woman ended up being due some damages? Or even, why don’t you? It would appear that the expected problems for the lady would nevertheless occur, irrespective of whether intercourse ended up being active in the deal.